Casinos That Accept POLi in Australia 2026: What Still Works, What Doesn’t, and Where Your Money Should Actually Go

Here is the part most “POLi casino” pages bury under a banner ad: POLi stopped operating in Australia on 30 September 2023. Not “limited”, not “bank-dependent”, not “temporarily unavailable while we migrate”. The company that ran it, POLi Payments, published a closure notice and told merchants to remove POLi from their checkout pages. So when you search for casinos that accept POLi in Australia in 2026, you are searching for a payment rail that no longer exists for consumers.

That does not make the question stupid. It makes the answer more useful. Australian players type “POLi casino” because they remember a method that moved money bank-to-bank, skipped the card networks, and did not trigger the gambling blocks that Visa and Mastercard have applied to this market for years. The need behind the search is real: a deposit route that works, clears fast, and does not get declined at 11pm on a Saturday. The label is just out of date.

What follows is a working list of Australian-facing casinos that still display POLi in their cashiers, an explanation of what happens when you click it, and a ranking of the operators that handle the post-POLi reality best. None of them holds an Australian casino licence, because online casino games are prohibited here under the Interactive Gambling Act 2001. That is not a footnote. It is the single most important fact on this page, and it should shape how much you deposit before you read another bonus headline.

The short answer: what “casinos that accept POLi” means in 2026

No Australian-facing online casino can honestly claim to process a live POLi deposit in 2026. What exists is a legacy cashier button. A small number of offshore operators kept the POLi logo because it converted well, then routed the actual payment through a bank-transfer aggregator, an e-wallet, or a PayID request under a different label. The player sees “POLi”, approves a transfer, and the balance lands. The plumbing underneath is something else.

That distinction matters for two reasons. First, if the button fails, support will often tell you the method is “temporarily unavailable” and point you at PayID or Neosurf. Second, if you deposit through a redirected rail and later request a withdrawal, the same-method rule may not work the way you expect, because the casino’s records show the processor, not the POLi brand you clicked. Neither outcome is a scam in itself. Both are reasons to know what you are actually using.

The practical replacement is PayID. It runs on the New Payments Platform, settles in under 60 seconds in most cases, and does the one thing POLi did well: it moves money without touching the card rails. Neosurf covers the cash-and-voucher crowd, and crypto covers the players who want the payout side to skip banks entirely. If your only requirement is “deposit like I used to with POLi”, PayID is the closest functional match. If your requirement is “show me a POLi logo”, you will find plenty of those. You will just be clicking a museum exhibit.

What POLi actually was, and the date almost every list gets wrong

POLi Payments launched in 2006 out of Melbourne, built by SecurePay Holdings and later acquired by Australia Post. The model was an account-to-account interface: you picked your bank, logged in through a POLi-hosted screen, authorised a transfer, and the merchant received confirmation within minutes. No card number was stored on the casino side. At its peak it connected to the four major banks plus roughly 30 smaller institutions.

For Australian gamblers, the appeal was structural rather than emotional. The major banks had been blocking gambling-coded card transactions since the mid-2010s, so Visa and Mastercard declines became routine at offshore venues. POLi sidestepped that entirely because a bank transfer does not carry a merchant category code that a bank can flag as gambling. It was not a “casino payment method” in any licensed sense. It was a payments intermediary that happened to work where cards did not.

The closure notice is unambiguous. POLi Payments states that “as of 30 September 2023, POLi will no longer operate in Australia”, citing declining acceptance and the financial non-viability of the business, and advises merchants to remove POLi AU from their checkout pages after that date. CBA stopped accepting POLi direct payments earlier, from 15 July 2023. Refunds could not be processed after 30 September 2023.

You will still see 2022, 2024 and even “still active” claims on affiliate pages. That inconsistency is a useful signal. If a site cannot pin down the shutdown year of the payment method it is ranking casinos for, it probably has not checked the cashier either. The official notice is the only source worth citing, and it says 2023.

Why the POLi button still exists in cashiers (and why it fails at the login step)

Payment pages at offshore casinos are updated on a slower cycle than the rest of the site. A brand can redesign its lobby twice a year and leave the banking page untouched for three. When POLi closed, some operators removed the logo, some replaced it with PayID, and some left it up because the conversion data looked good. The last group is what you are finding in 2026.

There is also an aggregator layer. A casino does not have to integrate every bank rail directly. It can connect to a payment processor that offers a menu of local methods, and that processor may keep a “POLi” label on a flow that now settles through a different account-to-account route. The player experiences a bank login and an instant credit, which is functionally identical to old POLi. The label is legacy; the settlement is not.

Failure usually happens at authentication, not at the casino. Several Australian banks removed POLi from their supported third-party payment lists before the shutdown, so the method can die at the bank-login step depending on who you bank with. If you are with a bank that still surfaces the old flow, it may work. If you are not, you get an error that looks like the casino’s fault but is actually your bank refusing the rail.

This is why the sensible test is not “does the logo exist?” but “does the cashier offer a live alternative alongside it?” A casino that lists POLi and nothing else is either stale or lazy. A casino that lists POLi next to PayID, Neosurf, Bitcoin and bank transfer is telling you the truth: POLi is a legacy label, and here are the rails that actually work.

Is any POLi casino legal in Australia? The ACMA reality

Online casino games are prohibited in Australia under the Interactive Gambling Act 2001. The ACMA is the regulator, and its register of licensed interactive gambling providers covers wagering and betting operators licensed by state and territory authorities, not casino-style games. The Northern Territory can issue an internet gaming licence, but the practical effect is that licensees offer products outside Australia, not pokies to Australian residents.

That means every brand on a “POLi casino Australia” list is offshore. The common licences are Curaçao, Anjouan and Kahnawake, with a small minority holding Malta Gaming Authority or UK Gambling Commission approvals. Those licences are not equivalent. The MGA and UKGC require segregated player funds, audited payout ratios and an external dispute-resolution path. Curaçao historically required none of that, and the 2024–2025 transition to the LOK framework introduced reporting and beneficial-ownership disclosure without yet producing uniform enforcement.

The enforcement side is not theoretical. ACMA issued formal warnings to six offshore operators in July 2026 and has built a blocking list that covered 1,788 illegal gambling and affiliate websites as at 20 August 2026. Civil penalties for offering illegal gambling can reach A$2.5 million per day for an individual and A$12.4 million per day for a corporation. None of that recovers your deposit if a payout goes wrong, but it explains why the market keeps shifting domains.

Here is the trade-off in plain terms. You get access to pokies, live dealer tables and bonuses that Australian-licensed bookmakers cannot offer. You give up local statutory protection, the Australian ombudsman route, and any realistic ability to escalate a dispute to an Australian regulator. The offshore licence gives you a paper trail at best. It does not give you a local referee.

The best POLi-era casinos for Australian players in 2026

This is not a list of casinos that process POLi, because none of them do. It is a list of Australian-facing operators that historically carried POLi, still show it in some cashiers as a legacy option, and handle the replacement rails well enough to be worth a deposit. Ranking weights licence quality, withdrawal behaviour and payment redundancy ahead of bonus size. A 300% match is worthless if the cashout queue takes nine days.

1. Rocket Casino. Curaçao-licensed, A$20 minimum, and the fastest PayID processing in this group, with withdrawals averaging under two hours and no crypto withdrawal cap. The pokies library leans on Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw, with Evolution live tables. The welcome offer is a 100% match up to A$1,000 plus 100 spins, but wagering sits at 40x, which is on the expensive side. POLi appears as a legacy label; PayID and crypto are the rails that actually clear.

2. National Casino. Also Curaçao, operated under the Dama N.V. umbrella. The library is the widest here at 5,000+ titles, PayID deposits credit instantly, and withdrawals typically land in one to four hours. Minimum deposit is generally A$20, with crypto lower and bank-transfer withdrawal minimums around A$50. One review notes the absence of POLi at the cashier, which is exactly the kind of inconsistency you should expect from a brand that has partially cleaned up its payment page.

3. Bizzo Casino. The low-stakes option. Deposits can start at A$10 for some methods, and the bonus structure is built around weekly reloads rather than a single heavy welcome match. Curaçao-licensed, clean interface, solid NetEnt coverage. PayID withdrawals run two to six hours, longer on weekends. If you want to test a site with A$20 rather than A$200, this is the one.

4. Bitstarz. Launched in 2014 and still one of the longer-serving crypto-first brands taking Australian players. Curaçao-licensed through Famagousta B.V., 6,000+ games, and a four-deposit welcome package advertised up to 5 BTC plus 180 spins, with an A$20 minimum qualifying deposit. Bitstarz is also the honest counter-example on this list: it does not pretend to support POLi. It pushes BTC, ETH and PayID, and the cashier is better for it.

5. King Billy Casino. Running since 2017, Curaçao-licensed, 3,000+ games, and a five-tier VIP programme with account managers from level three. The headline welcome is a 100% first-deposit match up to A$500 plus 200 spins, with wagering typically 30x to 50x on the bonus and a max bet around A$5 during playthrough. Average withdrawal sits around three hours. POLi is listed as a legacy option alongside PayID and bank transfer.

6. Joe Fortune. Built specifically for Australian punters since 2016, with a pokies-heavy library and AUD-denominated play. Curaçao-licensed, A$20 minimum for most promotions, 100% up to A$1,000 plus 30 spins, and PayID support. Bank-transfer withdrawals take two to five business days; crypto clears in roughly an hour. The trade-off is a smaller live-dealer section than the top three, but the pokies depth is real.

7. PlayAmo. A 3,000+ title library, A$20 minimum for cards and e-wallets, A$10 for crypto, and 40x wagering on the standard match. Curaçao-licensed. The withdrawal story is method-dependent: Bitcoin is fast, cards are not. If you are coming from POLi and want the payout side to move quickly, deposit in crypto and withdraw the same way rather than bouncing through a bank rail.

8. Ozwin Casino. The bonus-hunter pick. A 200% welcome match up to A$2,000 plus 50 free spins on selected Hacksaw titles, A$25 minimum, and wagering that sits at 30x to 40x depending on the promotion. Curaçao-licensed, PayID withdrawals in the three-to-six-hour range. The weekly withdrawal cap is more conservative than the deposit cap, which is the asymmetry to watch.

9. Fair Go Casino. Serving Australian players since 2017 and one of the longer-running brands in this bracket. Curaçao-licensed, A$20 minimum, a deep pokies library, and a welcome structure that has historically been a 100% match up to A$200 on each of the first five deposits, with 30x wagering on deposit plus bonus. Bank transfers run one to three business days; crypto clears in under two hours. POLi appears as a legacy listing, with Neosurf and PayID as the working alternatives.

10. Casino Mate. The licence outlier. Malta-licensed, which means segregated player funds, audited finances and a formal external dispute path. The trade-off is a smaller bonus, stricter verification and withdrawals in the 24-to-48-hour range. For a player who cares more about “who can I complain to” than “what is the match percentage”, this is the structurally safest name on the list. It is not a POLi brand, and that is part of the point.

Comparison table: the 10 operators side by side

Read the table for what it does not say. “Legacy POLi status” is not a feature. It is a warning that the cashier may still show a dead logo. The only column that affects whether you get paid is the payout column, and even that is a median, not a promise. The licence column tells you who you can complain to after the payout column fails.

The payment methods that replaced POLi

PayID is the default now, and the reason is mechanical. It runs on the New Payments Platform, which the Reserve Bank of Australia oversees, and it uses a mobile number, email address or ABN as the identifier instead of a BSB and account number. Settlement is typically under 60 seconds, 24 hours a day, including weekends and public holidays. For gambling deposits, the appeal is identical to POLi’s: no card rails, no merchant category code, no gambling block to trip over.

Neosurf is the cash option. Vouchers are sold at retail outlets, and the casino redeems the PIN. Minimums typically start at A$10, and the method is deposit-only in most cashiers. It is useful if you do not want a casino transaction on a bank statement at all, but the voucher fee is paid at the retailer and the exchange rate is whatever the outlet decides. Crypto is the fastest-growing route: Bitcoin and USDT deposits confirm in roughly 10 to 40 minutes depending on network congestion, and withdrawals avoid the banking system entirely.

Traditional bank transfer still works, and it is the fallback when PayID fails. It is also the slowest leg on the way out: one to three business days is normal, and weekends add two more. BPAY is a familiar bill-payment rail for Australians, but it is a poor fit for casino deposits because the reference-number flow is built for invoices, not instant crediting. Cards are the worst option in this market. Australian issuers have been blocking gambling-coded transactions for years, and a decline can trigger a fraud alert on the account.

The table exposes the central trade-off of the post-POLi market. The fastest deposit rails are not always the fastest withdrawal rails, and the method you use to deposit can constrain the method you use to withdraw. That is not a casino conspiracy. It is an anti-money-laundering rule, and it catches former POLi users more often than anyone else because the old rail no longer exists to return funds to.

Bonuses: the arithmetic behind the “free” money

A welcome bonus is not a gift. It is a wagering contract with a headline number designed to be photographed and a terms page designed to be skipped. The three numbers that decide whether an offer is worth anything are the wagering multiplier, the maximum bet during playthrough, and the maximum cashout. A 200% match at 40x sounds better than a 100% match at 30x until you run the arithmetic on a A$100 deposit.

Take a A$100 deposit with a 100% match and 40x wagering on the bonus. You receive A$100 in bonus funds and must place A$4,000 in qualifying bets before any of it converts to withdrawable cash. On a 96% RTP pokie, the expected loss on that turnover is roughly A$160. The bonus is A$100. The maths does not favour you, and that is before the max-bet rule, which is typically A$5 per spin during playthrough. A single A$10 spin can void the bonus.

King Billy’s headline is a 100% first-deposit match up to A$500 plus 200 spins, with wagering that typically sits at 30x to 50x and a max bet around A$5. Fair Go has historically run a 100% match up to A$200 on each of the first five deposits at 30x on deposit plus bonus. Ozwin’s 200% match up to A$2,000 plus 50 spins is real in the sense that the bonus is credited, but the wagering and the weekly withdrawal cap determine whether it ever leaves the account. None of these offers is fraudulent. All of them are priced.

The “free” spins deserve their own paragraph because the label does the heaviest lifting in the industry. A 50-spin offer on a high-volatility slot with a A$0.10 spin value is A$5 of turnover, not A$50 of value. If the winnings are capped at A$100 and the wagering is 30x, the expected value is a rounding error with a countdown timer. Casinos are not charities, and nobody is handing out money because they like your taste in pokies.

$10 deposits and low-roll play

The A$10 floor is real at a handful of operators, but it is method-specific. Bizzo accepts deposits from A$10 on some rails, and its bonus activation minimum has been advertised at the same level. PlayAmo’s crypto minimum sits around A$10, while cards and e-wallets sit at A$20. Most PayID and Neosurf casinos on the wider market set minimums at A$10, and a small number go to A$5. The old POLi-era norm was A$20 to A$30, which is why the low-roll segment now gravitates to PayID and Neosurf.

The trap with tiny deposits is not the deposit. It is the bonus qualification. A casino may accept A$10 but require A$20 or A$30 to activate the welcome offer, which means the “A$10 casino” is a deposit floor, not a bonus floor. Read the promotion terms separately from the banking page. They are written by different teams and they do not always agree.

Low-roll play also changes the withdrawal maths. If you deposit A$10, run it to A$40, and request a cashout, the minimum withdrawal threshold may be A$30 to A$50 depending on the method. That is not a reason to deposit more. It is a reason to check the cashout minimum before you play, because a win that cannot be withdrawn is a loyalty points balance with better graphics.

Withdrawals: where former POLi players get stuck

The first gate is verification. Before a first payout, the casino will ask for photo ID, proof of address dated within 90 days, and sometimes a selfie or source-of-funds document. This is not unique to offshore sites; Australian-licensed bookmakers do the same. The problem is timing. If you deposit and win before verifying, the withdrawal sits in limbo while documents are reviewed, often 24 to 72 hours. Complete KYC at signup and you skip the queue.

The second gate is the same-method rule. Many operators require withdrawals to return to the method used for deposit, up to the deposited amount. If you deposited A$500 via a legacy POLi flow that actually settled through a bank-transfer aggregator, the casino’s records may show the processor rather than the POLi label. That can produce a request for a bank transfer, a second verification step, or a support ticket that takes days to resolve. It is a standard AML measure, not a trick, but it surprises people who assumed the exit ramp matched the entrance.

The third gate is the payout window itself. Bank transfers run one to five business days and often longer if the request lands on a Friday. Crypto runs 10 minutes to two hours but adds a conversion step and network risk. E-wallets sit in the middle at 24 to 48 hours. The operators at the top of this list are there because they have shortened the middle of that process, not because their bonuses are bigger. Rocket’s sub-two-hour PayID average and National’s one-to-four-hour window are worth more than a 200% match with a nine-day queue.

Watch the asymmetry between deposit and withdrawal limits. A site that accepts A$30,000 in a day but caps withdrawals at A$2,000 per transaction is not offering convenience. It is offering a one-way valve. The same logic applies to weekly caps that are lower than the advertised bonus value. If the maximum weekly cashout is A$10,000 and the welcome package is “up to A$10,000”, the package is a marketing number, not a payout plan.

Games: pokies, live dealer, and what actually pays

The pokies libraries at these operators are built on Pragmatic Play, Hacksaw Gaming, NetEnt, Play’n GO and Microgaming, with Evolution dominating live dealer. That is a mature supply chain, and the difference between a 3,000-title lobby and a 6,000-title lobby is mostly padding: more clones, more Megaways reskins, more “exclusive” titles that are the same maths model with a different coat of paint. The number that matters is the RTP of the specific game you are playing, not the size of the lobby.

RTP disclosure is inconsistent across offshore brands. Some publish it per game, some bury it in a help file, and some do not publish it at all. A 96% RTP pokie and a 94% RTP pokie look identical in the lobby and behave very differently over 1,000 spins. If a casino makes RTP easy to find, that is a quality signal. If it does not, assume the lower end of the range and size your session accordingly.

Live dealer is where the jurisdiction gap shows up most clearly. Evolution tables stream from regulated studios, but the dispute path for a hand settlement runs through the operator’s licence, not the studio’s. An MGA-licensed brand gives you an external arbiter. A Curaçao-licensed brand gives you the operator’s complaints email and, if you are persistent, the regulator’s portal. The cards are the same; the referee is not.

Mobile casinos and the app question

Most Australian-facing casinos are browser-first, and that is a feature rather than a limitation. A responsive lobby avoids the app-store problem entirely: Apple and Google do not want real-money gambling apps for Australian users, and sideloaded APKs are a security risk that no legitimate operator needs. The practical experience on a phone is a mobile web session, a cashier that opens your banking app for PayID approval, and a return redirect that credits the balance.

The banking-app handoff is the part that breaks. PayID requests can fail if the name on the casino account does not match the name on the bank account, and the error message often appears in the banking app rather than the casino. Legacy POLi flows had the same problem at the bank-login step. If a deposit fails, check the account name before you open a support ticket. It is the most common cause and the least dramatic fix.

Push notifications and biometric login are the two mobile features worth caring about. A casino that supports Face ID or fingerprint login has usually invested in its account layer, which correlates with fewer KYC delays. A casino that only supports a password and an email OTP is not necessarily unsafe, but it is a signal that the product team stopped at the minimum.

New POLi-style casinos and how to vet them

“New POLi casino” is a search term with no legal meaning. There is no such thing as a POLi-licensed casino, and a new brand cannot resurrect a payment rail that closed in 2023. What the term actually describes is a recently launched offshore operator that lists POLi as a legacy option and markets to Australian players. Some of those brands are legitimate businesses with Curaçao licences and real payout records. Some are white-label clones with the same games, the same bonus template and a support desk that disappears after three months.

The vetting sequence is short. First, check the licence number and the regulator on the ACMA register, not on the casino’s own footer; if the brand is not on the register, it is offshore, and you should treat it as such. Second, open the cashier and see whether POLi is listed alongside at least two live rails. A lone POLi logo is a stale page. Third, read the withdrawal section of the terms for the same-method rule, the maximum cashout and the verification timeline. Fourth, search the brand name plus “withdrawal complaint” and see whether the results are affiliate listicles or actual player threads.

Red flags that justify walking away: a licence claim with no number, a bonus with a maximum cashout lower than the deposit, a cashier that accepts deposits but has no visible withdrawal method, support that answers only by email with a 48-hour turnaround, and a payment page that lists POLi as “instant” without naming a single alternative. None of these is proof of fraud. Together they describe a business that is optimised for deposits and indifferent to payouts.

How we ranked these operators

Licence quality carried the most weight, followed by withdrawal behaviour, then payment redundancy, then bonus terms. We treated “POLi listed” as a neutral data point, not a ranking factor, because the rail is closed. We did not reward headline bonus percentages above 200% unless the wagering, max-bet and max-cashout terms were also disclosed. We did not include any brand that could not be checked against a named regulator.

Withdrawal behaviour was assessed on the method-specific windows the operators publish, cross-checked against player reports where available. We separated PayID, crypto and bank-transfer timelines because averaging them hides the thing that matters. A brand with a two-hour PayID window and a five-day bank window is fast for some players and slow for others, and the ranking should say so.

We excluded affiliate-only claims that could not be traced to a cashier page or a terms document. That removed several brands that appear on competitor lists with glowing scores and no verifiable payout data. It also removed the “no deposit bonus” offers that require a deposit to activate, which is a contradiction the industry has somehow normalised.

Responsible gambling in a post-POLi market

BetStop is the National Self-Exclusion Register, and it lets you exclude yourself from all Australian-licensed online and phone wagering services in a single step, for a minimum of three months up to a lifetime. It is free, and it works. The gap is that BetStop covers licensed wagering providers, not offshore casinos. An exclusion registered through BetStop does not automatically block a Curaçao-licensed casino, which is one of the practical costs of playing offshore.

The tools that do work at the operator level are session timers, reality checks, deposit limits and cooling-off periods. A session timer tracks continuous login time and forces a logout or a re-confirmation when it expires. A reality check is a pop-up that shows your net position for the session. Deposit limits are enforced at the payment gateway, and decreases take effect immediately while increases usually carry a 24-hour delay. Those asymmetries are deliberate. They are the actual protection, not the marketing copy.

If you need help, the National Gambling Helpline is 1800 858 858, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and Gambling Help Online offers web chat and support. If you are going to play offshore, set a deposit limit before your first deposit, verify your account before your first withdrawal, and treat the bonus as a separate product from the deposit. The casino’s job is to keep you playing. Your job is to decide the number before you start.

One more thing worth saying plainly: the absence of POLi is not a crisis. PayID does the same job faster, Neosurf does it with cash, and crypto does it without a bank. The players who got hurt by the POLi shutdown were the ones who kept clicking a dead button and assumed the failure was temporary. The button is not coming back. The rails that replaced it are better. Use those.

Are there any casinos that still accept POLi in Australia in 2026?

No casino processes a live POLi deposit in Australia in 2026. POLi Payments ceased Australian operations on 30 September 2023 and advised merchants to remove it from checkout. A few offshore casinos still display a legacy POLi logo, but the payment either fails at bank login or is quietly routed through a bank-transfer aggregator or PayID.

What is the closest replacement for POLi at an Australian online casino?

PayID is the closest functional replacement. It runs on the New Payments Platform, settles in under 60 seconds in most cases, and moves money without touching the card networks, which is the same reason POLi worked. Neosurf covers cash deposits, and Bitcoin or USDT cover players who want the withdrawal side to bypass banks entirely.

Can you withdraw winnings back to POLi?

You never could. POLi was a deposit-only rail even before it closed, and withdrawals went by bank transfer, card, e-wallet or crypto. In 2026 the same-method rule at many casinos creates a second problem: if your deposit was routed through a legacy POLi flow, the casino’s records may show a different processor, so the withdrawal path may require a bank transfer and extra verification.

Is a POLi casino legal in Australia?

No Australian-licensed operator can offer online casino games to players in Australia under the Interactive Gambling Act 2001. Every “POLi casino” is offshore, typically licensed in Curaçao, Anjouan or Kahnawake. Those licences do not give you access to an Australian ombudsman or local consumer law, and ACMA maintains a blocking list of illegal gambling sites that ran to 1,788 domains by August 2026.

Which casino has the fastest withdrawal for former POLi users?

On the operator data available, Rocket Casino has the shortest PayID window at under two hours on average, with National Casino next at one to four hours. Crypto withdrawals at Bitstarz and Joe Fortune typically clear in ten minutes to two hours. Bank transfers at any of these brands run one to five business days, so the method matters more than the logo.

Can I deposit just A$10 at a POLi-era casino?

Yes, but usually not through a POLi label. Bizzo accepts deposits from A$10 on some methods, and PlayAmo’s crypto minimum sits around A$10 while cards and e-wallets sit at A$20. Most PayID and Neosurf casinos set a A$10 floor. Check the bonus activation minimum separately, because a A$10 deposit may not qualify for the welcome offer.

Why do some casino pages still show a POLi logo?

Payment pages are updated less often than lobbies, and some operators kept the logo because it converted well before the shutdown. In other cases a payment aggregator retains the POLi label on a flow that now settles through a different account-to-account rail. Treat the logo as evidence of a stale page, not evidence of a working payment method.